Anaphylaxis: A Decade of a Nationwide Allergy Society Registry

Background: Anaphylaxis is an acute, life-threatening, multiorgan hypersensitivity reaction.Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the causes of anaphylaxis in Portugal in order to improve our knowledge of epidemiology and management.Methods: We implemented a nationwide notification system for anaphylaxis over a 10-year period, with voluntary reporting by allergists. Data on 1783 patients with anaphylaxis were included. Etiopathogenesis, manifestations, and clinical management were characterized in detail for both children and adults.Results: The mean age was 32.7 (20.3) years, and 30% were under 18 years of age; 58% were female. The mean age at the first anaphylaxis episode was 27.5 (20.4) years (ranging from 1 month to 88 years). The main culprits of anaphylaxis were foods (48%), drugs (37%) (main trigger in adults, 48%), and hymenoptera venom (7%). The main culprit foods were shellfish (27%), fresh fruit (17%), cow’s milk (16%), tree nuts (15%), fish (8%), egg (7%), and peanut (7%). The main drugs were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (43%), antibiotics (39%), and anesthetic agents (6%). Other causes included exercise (3%), latex (2%), cold-induced anaphylaxis (2%), and idiopathic anaphylaxis (2%). Most patients (80%) were admitted to the emergency department; only 43% received adrenaline. Anaphylaxis recurred in 41% of patients (21% with ≥3 anaphylactic episodes); 7% used an adrenaline autoinjector device.Conclusions: Food is the leading cause of anaphylaxis in Portugal, while drugs were the main elicitors in adults. We emphasize undertreatment with adrenaline and recurrent episodes, highlighting the need to improve diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to anaphylaxis (AU)

Antecedentes: La anafilaxia es una reacción de hipersensibilidad sistémica potencialmente mortal.Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue el identificar las causas de la anafilaxia en Portugal para mejorar el conocimiento de la epidemiologíay del manejo de la enfermedad.Métodos: Durante un período de 10 años, se implementó un sistema nacional de notificación de anafilaxia, por parte de los alergólogos,mediante la emisión de informes voluntarios. Se recogieron datos de 1.783 pacientes con anafilaxia, pediátricos y adultos, relativos a laetiopatogenia, las manifestaciones clínicas y el manejo clínico de la misma.Resultados: La edad media fue de 32,7 ± 20,3 años, siendo el 30% de los pacientes menores de 18 años. El 58% fueron mujeres. Laedad media del primer episodio de anafilaxia fue de 27,5 ± 20,4 años (desde 1 mes hasta 88 años). Los principales agentes responsablesde anafilaxia fueron los alimentos (48%), los medicamentos (37%), que fue el principal desencadenante en los pacientes adultos, y losvenenos de himenópteros (7%). Los principales alimentos responsables fueron: mariscos (27%), frutas frescas (17%), leche de vaca (16%),nueces (15%), pescado (8%), huevo (7%) y cacahuete (7%). Los principales fármacos, fueron los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (43%),antibióticos (39%) y anestésicos (6%). Entre otras causas implicadas se incluyó: ejercicio físico (3%), látex (2%), frío (2%) e idiopática (2%). La mayoría de los pacientes fueron atendidos en el servicio de urgencias (80%), y solo el 43% recibió tratamiento con adrenalina.La recurrencia de la anafilaxia ocurrió en el 41% de los pacientes (21% con ≥3 episodios anafilácticos). El 7% utilizó un dispositivoautoinyector de adrenalina.Conclusiones: Los alimentos son la principal causa de anafilaxia en Portugal y en el subgrupo de pacientes adultos, lo son los medicamentos

Anaphylaxis: A Decade of a Nationwide Allergy Society Registry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anaphylaxis is an acute, life-threatening, multiorgan hypersensitivity reaction. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the causes of anaphylaxis in Portugal in order to improve our knowledge of epidemiology and management. METHODS: We implemented a nationwide notification system for anaphylaxis over a 10-year period, with voluntary reporting by allergists. Data on 1783 patients with anaphylaxis were included. Etiopathogenesis, manifestations, and clinical management were characterized in detail for both children and adults. RESULTS: The mean age was 32.7 (20.3) years, and 30% were under 18 years of age; 58% were female. The mean age at the first anaphylaxis episode was 27.5 (20.4) years (ranging from 1 month to 88 years). The main culprits of anaphylaxis were foods (48%), drugs (37%) (main trigger in adults, 48%), and hymenoptera venom (7%). The main culprit foods were shellfish (27%), fresh fruit (17%), cow's milk (16%), tree nuts (15%), fish (8%), egg (7%), and peanut (7%). The main drugs were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (43%), antibiotics (39%), and anesthetic agents (6%). Other causes included exercise (3%), latex (2%), cold-induced anaphylaxis (2%), and idiopathic anaphylaxis (2%). Most patients (80%) were admitted to the emergency department; only 43% received adrenaline. Anaphylaxis recurred in 41% of patients (21% with ≥3 anaphylactic episodes); 7% used an adrenaline autoinjector device. CONCLUSION: Food is the leading cause of anaphylaxis in Portugal, while drugs were the main elicitors in adults. We emphasize undertreatment with adrenaline and recurrent episodes, highlighting the need to improve diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to anaphylaxis.

Pru p 3 sublingual immunotherapy ultra-rush protocol is safe and clinically effective.

Summary: Introduction. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with Pru p 3 can prevent severe allergic reactions to LTP-containing foods, but the standard initiation protocol is time-consuming. Objectives. Establish the safety of a novel ultra-rush initiation protocol for SLIT with Pru p 3. Methods. Prospective study comparing the side effects of the standard vs novel ultra-rush initiation protocols of SLIT with Pru p 3 in patients with anaphylaxis to LTP. Results. Fifteen patients were included (standard initiation, 5; ultra-rush initiation, 10), 80% females. All patients had oropharyngeal pruritus during initiation, 80% with spontaneous recovery, but no other gastro-intestinal, respiratory, cutaneous or systemic side effects occurred in any patient of both groups. Conclusion. The novel ultra-rush protocol halved the build-up time without increasing side effects.

Anaphylaxis in a food allergy outpatient department: one-year review.

Summary: Background. Anaphylaxis is an acute, potentially fatal, multi-organ allergic reac-tion. Our aim was to characterize the population with food induced anaphylaxis followed over a one-year period. Methods. Retrospective analysis of clinical files of patients with food anaphylaxis observed in our food allergy consultation during 2016. Results. Sixty-two patients were included. In the pediatric group, the implicated allergens were cow's milk, egg and fish and in the adults' group, the commonest allergens were nuts and wheat. Allergy to shrimp affected equally children and adults. The most frequent symptoms were urticaria (85.5%), angioedema (64.5%) and dyspnea (62.9%). Cofactors were present in 32.6% of patients, mainly exercise. Asthma and/or rhinitis were the most frequent comorbidities. Conclusion. In accordance to other studies, milk and egg were the most implicated allergens in children. Anaphylaxis in adults reflects the Mediterranean sensitization pattern. Exercise was the most relevant cofactor.

Severe anaphylaxis with cardiac arrest caused by prick test with cefuroxime

No disponible

Allergy to red meat in adulthood: a case report

No disponible

Urticaria after ingestion of alcoholic beverages

No disponible

A curious case of exercise-induced wheat allergy in adulthood

No disponible

Walnut allergens: molecular characterization, detection and clinical relevance.

Food-induced allergies have been regarded as an emergent problem of public health. Classified as important allergenic ingredients, the presence of walnut and other nuts as hidden allergens in processed foods constitutes a risk for sensitized individuals, being a real problem of allergen management. Attending to the increasing importance dedicated to walnut allergy, this review intends to provide the relevant and up-to-date information on main issues such as the prevalence of walnut allergy, the clinical threshold levels, the molecular characterization of walnut allergens and their clinical relevance, as well as the methodologies for walnut allergen detection in foods. As the walnut used in human diet comes from Juglans regia and Juglans nigra, the molecular characterization of the allergens from both species included in the prolamins (Jug r 1, Jug n 1 and Jug r 3), cupins (Jug r 2, Jug n 2 and Jug r 4) and profilins (Jug r 5), together with respective clinical relevance, were compiled in this review. The most recent progresses on walnut allergen detection techniques (protein- and DNA-based) are described and critically compared, including the emergent multitarget approaches.

Low-dose intravenous gammaglobulin in the treatment of severe autoimmune urticaria.

BACKGROUND: An autoimmune pathogenic mechanism is implicated in about one-third of patients with chronic urticaria (CU), involving circulating functional autoantibodies to either the high affinity IgE receptor (LgG1/IgG3 anti-FcARI) or to IgE, with histamine releasing activity. New therapeutic approaches had been developed for patients with severe or unresponsive to treatment symptoms, including the use of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) as immunomodulators. AIM: To assess the efficacy of IVIG treatment in patients with evidence of autoimmune CU. METHODS: A group of 29 patients (F = 20, M = 9) with the diagnosis of autoimmune CU were selected from the outpatient department. All the patients showed daily symptoms of urticaria and/or angioedema, with unsatisfactory response to conventional therapy and a positive intradermal autologous serum test (AST). They were submitted to low dose of IVIG treatment each 4 weeks (0.15 g/kg), for a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 51 months. They were evaluated for clinical scores, need of oral medication and AST results, before and after treatment. RESULTS: A clinical improvement was observed in 26 patients, with reduction of urticaria or angioedema complaints (p < 0.0001) and decreasing need for oral antihistamine medication (p = 0.002). 3 patients drop-out the treatment: one depending of severe adverse event and the other 2 with no response after the 5th treatment. 19:26 patients achieved complete remission of symptoms. A reduction of histamine-releasing activity was found in the majority of the patients, documented by the decrea, se of reactivity in AST at the end of the treatment (p = 0.002). 20 patients remained without symptoms during 12 months after. the active treatment, and the other 6 only reported non-severe complaints. CONCLUSION: IVIG is an effective therapeutic option in patients suffering from severe CU refractory to conventional treatment, in which autoimmune mechanism is involved. The efficacy persists for at least 12 months after treatment. However, the number of infusions needed to achieve clinical control, showed great range between patients.

Specific immunotherapy for severe latex allergy.

We studied 4 patients (3 adult females + 13y old boy) with latex allergy. All patients had anaphylaxis related with latex and oral-latex-fruit syndrome. All 3 females had severe symptoms in the workplace. The boy had spina bifida with 9 previous surgeries and needed further surgical interventions. Positive skin prick tests (SPT), the presence of serum latex specific IgE (CAP-RAST, Pharmacia-Upjohn, Sweden- class 3 in the 3 females and class 4 in the boy) demonstrated the sensitisation. All 4 patients were treated with specific immunotherapy (SIT) with aqueous extract (ALK-ALK-ABELLO SA, Spain) administered subcutaneously at the hospital, by a modified rush schedule. A maintenance dose (MD) of 0.35_g protein was established according to the magnitude of local reactions (LRs). In one patient a higher dose induced the appearance of a systemic reaction (SR) 40 min after administration, which promptly remitted with treatment. After reaching MD, all 3 females remained assymptomatic at workplace. A challenge test with latex gloves was performed. Two months after MD was reached 2 females had no symptoms and one other had mild symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis. The boy was subjected to a surgical intervention with no allergic reaction. We also observed a reduction on skin reactivity to latex in all patients by prick tests. We consider SIT with latex to be highly effective, safe and well tolerated provided we use this dose of the allergenic extract.